Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A straightforward approach to designing a scoring system for predicting length-of-stay of cardiac surgery patients

Original Submission
1 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Paolo Barbini
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Higgins
4 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Thomas Keegan
23 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ollivier Hyrien
24 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Paolo Barbini
Resubmission - Version 3
24 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Higgins
21 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Paolo Barbini
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Higgins
23 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marina Velikova
25 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Paolo Barbini
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Paolo Barbini
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marina Velikova
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
10 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
13 Oct 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-14-89

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page