Peer Review reports
From: A survey on computer aided diagnosis for ocular diseases
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 4 Mar 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruchir Srivastava |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 4 Mar 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 18 Apr 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark van Grinsven |
| 9 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yuji Hatanaka |
| 19 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah |
| 19 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruchir Srivastava |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 19 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 15 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruchir Srivastava |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 15 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| 24 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruchir Srivastava |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 24 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Aug 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Aug 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-14-80 |
You can find further information about peer review here.