Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of physicians, patients, and pharmaceutical claims included in the analysis

From: Effect of electronic prescribing with formulary decision support on medication tier, copayments, and adherence

Characteristics

Non-users

Low users

High users

p-value*

PCPs

 

N (%)

1570 (86%)

187 (10%)

74 (4%)

 

Specialty

 
 

Family practice

490 (31%)

67 (36%)

28 (38%)

0.03

Internal medicine

838 (54%)

103 (55%)

35 (47%)

Non-surgical

2 (0.13%)

1 (0.53%)

1 (1.4%)

Pediatrics

235 (15%)

16 (8.6%)

10 (14%)

Practice size

 
 

1 physician

783 (50%)

64 (34%)

29 (39%)

<0.01

2–5 physicians

612 (39%)

90 (48%)

39 (53%)

6–10 physicians

148 (10%)

30 (16%)

6 (8.1%)

11–25 physicians

20 (1.3%)

3 (1.6%)

0 (0%)

> 25 physicians

2 (0.13%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Patients (PCPs’ primary care patients)

 

N (%)

12327 (86%)

1505 (10%)

578 (4.0%)

 

Age, mean ± SD

45.8 ± 19.5

49.2 ± 16.0

47.7 ± 18.3

<0.0001

Female, N (%)

6367 (52%)

776 (52%)

285 (49%)

0.55

Neighborhood income

 

<45 k

2132 (18%)

261 (18%)

92 (17%)

0.13

45 k – 75 k

6970 (58%)

878 (60%)

310 (56%)

> = 75 k

2899 (24%)

321 (22%)

152 (27%)

Claims (pre-2006 ARB and IS index claims for >15 days of medication)

 

N (%)

12563 (86%)

1533 (10%)

586 (4.0%)

 

ARB claims, N (%)

9094 (72%)

1238 (81%)

448 (77%)

 

Frequency > once daily, N (%)

1563 (12%)

125 (8.2%)

65 (11%)

 

E-prescribing adoption dates

(Synthetic)

 

Median

 

August 4, 2005

July 27, 2005

August 19, 2005

0.60

1st quartile

 

June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

June 8, 2005

3rd quartile

 

September 29, 2005

September 27, 2005

October 12, 2005

  1. *Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical comparisons because of low or zero counts in some cells. ANOVA was used for continuous variables.
  2. **Patients having an index ARB or IS claim.