Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Babin |
28 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nuwan Waidyanatha |
12 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Zeng |
30 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Benedict Michael |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Babin |
16 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Zeng |
29 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nuwan Waidyanatha |
11 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Benedict Michael |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
11 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Benedict Michael |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
11 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
26 Jun 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-70 |
You can find further information about peer review here.