Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ellen M Mikkelsen |
26 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karthik Ghosh |
28 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmel Apicella |
16 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lidewij Henneman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
31 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lidewij Henneman |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
31 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
8 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmel Apicella |
14 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ellen M Mikkelsen |
15 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Lidewij Henneman |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
15 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
9 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ellen M Mikkelsen |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Publishing | ||
22 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Apr 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-55 |
You can find further information about peer review here.