Peer Review reports
From: Ancillary study management systems: a review of needs
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Payne |
| 20 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - meredith nahm |
| 23 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wenle Zhao |
| 25 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Greg Fegan |
| 22 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Nelson |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Payne |
| 19 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wenle Zhao |
| 21 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Nelson |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.