Skip to main content

Table 2 Local and global weight of needs (CR≤0.1)

From: User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner

 

radiology

ear surgery

neurology

emergency neurology

emergency

 

GW

(LW)

GW

(LW)

GW

(LW)

GW

(LW)

GW

(LW)

PERFORMANCE

          

  Spatial Resolution

.07

(.32)

.28

(.64)

.19

(.48)

.08

(.43)

.05

(.30)

  Speed Run

.10

(.46)

.05

(.11)

.04

(.11)

.08

(.43)

.09

(.52)

  Processing software

.05

(.22)

.11

(.26)

.16

(.41)

.03

(.14)

.03

(.18)

SAFETY

          

  Patient radiation dose

.16

(.33)

.11

(.33)

.10

(.33)

.08

(.14)

.11

(.18)

  Patient Monitoring

.16

(.33)

.11

(.33)

.10

(.33)

.33

(.58)

.40

(.66)

  Contrast medium control

.16

(.33)

.11

(.33)

.10

(.33)

.16

(.28)

.10

(.16)

USABILITY

          

  Personnel Education

.13

(.69)

.07

(.52)

.07

(.32)

.08

(.48)

.04

(.33)

  User-friendly GUI

.04

(.23)

.03

(.18)

.05

(.22)

.02

(.11)

.04

(.33)

  Interoperability

.02

(.08)

.04

(.30)

.10

(.46)

.07

(.41)

.04

(.33)

TECHNICAL ISSUES

          

  Technical Assistance

.04

(.33)

.03

(.33)

.02

(.22)

.05

(.66)

.04

(.46)

  Maintenance

.04

(.33)

.03

(.33)

.03

(.32)

.01

(.16)

.03

(.32)

  Data Storing

.04

(.33)

.03

(.33)

.05

(.46)

.01

(.18)

.02

(.22)