Skip to main content

Table 2 Local and global weight of needs (CR≤0.1)

From: User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner

  radiology ear surgery neurology emergency neurology emergency
  GW (LW) GW (LW) GW (LW) GW (LW) GW (LW)
PERFORMANCE           
  Spatial Resolution .07 (.32) .28 (.64) .19 (.48) .08 (.43) .05 (.30)
  Speed Run .10 (.46) .05 (.11) .04 (.11) .08 (.43) .09 (.52)
  Processing software .05 (.22) .11 (.26) .16 (.41) .03 (.14) .03 (.18)
SAFETY           
  Patient radiation dose .16 (.33) .11 (.33) .10 (.33) .08 (.14) .11 (.18)
  Patient Monitoring .16 (.33) .11 (.33) .10 (.33) .33 (.58) .40 (.66)
  Contrast medium control .16 (.33) .11 (.33) .10 (.33) .16 (.28) .10 (.16)
USABILITY           
  Personnel Education .13 (.69) .07 (.52) .07 (.32) .08 (.48) .04 (.33)
  User-friendly GUI .04 (.23) .03 (.18) .05 (.22) .02 (.11) .04 (.33)
  Interoperability .02 (.08) .04 (.30) .10 (.46) .07 (.41) .04 (.33)
TECHNICAL ISSUES           
  Technical Assistance .04 (.33) .03 (.33) .02 (.22) .05 (.66) .04 (.46)
  Maintenance .04 (.33) .03 (.33) .03 (.32) .01 (.16) .03 (.32)
  Data Storing .04 (.33) .03 (.33) .05 (.46) .01 (.18) .02 (.22)