From: Video observation in HIT development: lessons learned on benefits and challenges
Case nr. | Objectives | Design | Context | Video observation technique | Complementary data collection methods |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1[12] | Assessment of the laborsaving effect by recycling administrative data. Focus on data-entry | a) Quantitative before/after evaluation - time-study | 8 hospital wards at 5 different hospitals | 2 researchers, each of them observing the data-entry with and without recycling administrative data for app. 3 hours at each ward | Interviews with the ward management and the nurses responsible for entering data into the systems at each ward |
Assessment of time consumption before and after data-entry | b) Qualitative ethnographic evaluation study | ||||
2[18] | Assessment of the clinical benefits of implementing IT-boards for better overview with focus on the clinicians points of view | Qualitative ethnographic evaluation study | 1 hospital ward | 2 researchers, each of them observing the work practice after the implementation of the IT-boards for 1 full day (app. 7 hours) | Interviews with ward management |
3[44] | Assessment of the clinical benefits by implementing EHR in a region in Danmark – focus on the clinicians points of view | a) Qualitative and quantitative* before/after evaluation study | 5 hospital wards at 4 different hospitals | 3 researchers, each of them observing 1 full day (app. 8 hours) at each ward before implementation and 1 full day (app. 8 hours) at each ward after implementation | Personal observation, Interviews with ward management and 2 physicians and 2 nurses selected by management at each ward. Questionnaires, Insight into documents |
Continuous feed-back on the process to the project management | b) Process evaluation | ||||
4[19] | Creation of a basic understanding of the medication process in a cardiology department | Qualitative survey study | 1 hospital ward | 2 researchers each of them observing for a full day (app. 7 hours) | Photo supported interviews (photos taken by respondents) |