Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners

Original Submission
27 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Derek Hoare
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Derek Hoare
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Grant Searchfield
21 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Atcherson
22 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - NIGEL PADGHAM
24 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stella Forti
25 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - rich tyler
26 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pauline Smith
19 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Derek Hoare
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
12 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-70

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page