Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study

Original Submission
20 Jul 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dawn Dowding
19 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou
2 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Niels Peek
18 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Joan Ash
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou
17 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Niels Peek
8 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Joan Ash
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Niels Peek
25 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Joan Ash
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Joan Ash
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
6 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Joan Ash
Resubmission - Version 6
6 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Joan Ash
Resubmission - Version 7
8 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
14 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page