Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dawn Dowding |
19 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou |
2 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niels Peek |
18 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joan Ash |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou |
17 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niels Peek |
8 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joan Ash |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niels Peek |
25 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Joan Ash |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Joan Ash |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Joan Ash |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
8 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Joan Ash |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
8 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
14 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.