Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ray Jones |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
19 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Siaw-Teng Liaw |
31 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Murray |
6 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kay Jones |
13 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ray Jones |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Murray |
20 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kay Jones |
3 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Siaw-Teng Liaw |
7 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ray Jones |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
7 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
29 Mar 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Mar 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-25 |
You can find further information about peer review here.