Peer Review reports
From: Practice guidelines and clinical risk assessment models: is it time to reform?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Enzo Grossi |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Caprini |
| 29 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nariman Sepehrvand |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Caprini |
| 15 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nariman Sepehrvand |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 28 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nariman Sepehrvand |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 28 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-11-63 |
You can find further information about peer review here.