Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
25 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Hsieh |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kyrre Emblem |
31 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ezzeddine Zagrouba |
18 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Hsieh |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
23 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kyrre Emblem |
11 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ezzeddine Zagrouba |
9 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Hsieh |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
6 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Hsieh |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Hsieh |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
26 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-11-54 |
You can find further information about peer review here.