Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marschollek |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Speechley |
| 7 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Vassallo |
| 7 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Barker |
| 27 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marschollek |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Speechley |
| 24 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Vassallo |
| 26 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Barker |
| 14 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marschollek |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 24 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marschollek |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 24 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 27 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marschollek |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 27 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-11-48 |
You can find further information about peer review here.