Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria de Ridder |
18 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Rogol |
26 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giorgio Bedogni |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
14 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael B Ranke |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giorgio Bedogni |
31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria de Ridder |
10 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael B Ranke |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael B Ranke |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
30 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael B Ranke |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
1 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-11-38 |
You can find further information about peer review here.