Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Hägglund |
16 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phillip Asaro |
9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Ballermann |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phillip Asaro |
23 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Hägglund |
30 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Ballermann |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Ballermann |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Ballermann |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
10 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Ballermann |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
10 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
17 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
17 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-11-32 |
You can find further information about peer review here.