Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Derek Stewart |
13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin |
22 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sabi Redwood |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sabi Redwood |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sabi Redwood |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Derek Stewart |
29 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin |
8 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sabi Redwood |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
9 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sabi Redwood |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
9 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
12 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-11-29 |
You can find further information about peer review here.