Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeffrey Ferranti |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Kim |
11 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Heleen van der Sijs |
26 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lemuel Waitman |
17 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeffrey Ferranti |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Heleen van der Sijs |
7 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Kim |
13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lemuel Waitman |
2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeffrey Ferranti |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeffrey Ferranti |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
21 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-11-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.