From: Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation
Stages | Additional explanation |
---|---|
1. Transcription | Pseudonymized audio-recordings were transcribed a verbatim by a third-party |
2. Familiarization with the interview | The researcher (EDS) thoroughly read the transcripts, made reflective notes, and relistened to the audio-recordings, if necessary |
3. Coding | The researcher (EDS) coded 2 transcripts via a hybrid deductive and inductive approach. The provotypes presented during the interviews informed the creation of deductive codes while inductive codes were created based upon observed patterns |
4. Developing a working analytical framework | Codes sharing similarities in content were grouped into categories, creating a working analytical framework |
5. Applying the analytical framework | The researcher (EDS) applied the working analytical framework, also referred to as the coding tree (Additional file 2), to the other transcripts by using NVivo software |
6. Charting data into the framework matrix | The data were charted into the framework matrix. Microsoft Excel was used to summarize the data from each code and transcript |
7. Interpreting the data | The data were interpreted to identify similarities and differences between the data |