Skip to main content

Table 4 A list of each of the standards within the SRQR and both the number and percentage of articles that met these standards

From: An exploration into physician and surgeon data sensemaking: a qualitative systematic review using thematic synthesis

Standard taken directly from the SRQR

Number of articles that met this standard

Percentage of articles that met this standard

Title and abstract

  

 S1: Title

3

27%

 S2: Abstract

11

100%

Introduction

  

 S3: Problem formulation

11

100%

 S4: Purpose or research question

11

100%

Methods

  

 S5: Qualitative approach and research paradigm

11

100%

 S6: Researcher characteristics and reflexivity

7

64%

 S7: Context

10

91%

 S8: Sampling strategy

9

82%

 S9: Ethical issues pertaining to human subjects

11

100%

 S10: Data collection methods

11

100%

 S11: Data collection instruments and technologies

11

100%

 S12: Units of study

10

91%

 S13: Data processing

11

100%

 S14: Data analysis

11

100%

 S15: Techniques to enhance trustworthiness

9

82%

Results/findings

  

 S16: Synthesis and interpretation

11

100%

 S17: Links to empirical data

10

91%

Discussion

  

 S18: Integration with prior work, implications, transferability, and contribution(s) to the field

11

100%

 S19: Limitations

11

100%

Other

  

 S20: Conflicts of interest

10

91%

 S21: Funding

8

73%