Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison results with existing algorithms. The Rel-En algorithm performed better, both in terms of false positive and false negative rates on the validation cohort

From: Evaluation and optimization of novel extraction algorithms for the automatic detection of atrial activations recorded within the pulmonary veins during atrial fibrillation

 

CLI

NLEO

Rel-En

False negative

0.83%

1.77%

0.24%*

False positive

2.80%

1.24%

0.04%*

Total error rate

3.63%

3.01%

0.28%*

  1. *p-value < 0.05 Rel-En versus CLI and Rel-En versus NLEO using Wilcoxon rank-sum test
  2. The bold typo is used to highlight the final error, the other errors are partial errors
Back to article page

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us