Skip to main content

Table 3 Pilot study evaluation of decision tool

From: Clinician based decision tool to guide recommended interval between colonoscopies: development and evaluation pilot study

Did endoscopist recommendation agree with tool?
  All colonoscopies (N = 58) Excluding colonoscopies with incorrect tool use (N = 46)
No 16 (28%) 16 (35%)
Yes 30 (52%) 30 (65%)
Incorrectly used tool (stated agreement but chart review suggests disagreement) 4 (7%)
Endoscopist recommended no follow-up because of age but tool recommended f/u 6 (10%)
Other reason that endoscopist right/tool not applicable (hereditary syndrome/anal cancer) 2 (3%)
Endoscopist evaluation of tool (N = 5 endoscopists)a
Tool reliable Tool easy to use Tool information new or familiar Would use tool in practice
Strongly disagree 0 Strongly disagree 0 Very familiar 1 Very unlikely 1
Disagree 0 Disagree 0 Familiar 0 Unlikely 2
Neutral 0 Neutral 0 Unsure 0 Neutral 1
Agree 3 Agree 2 New 2 Likely 1
Strongly agree 2 Strongly agree 3 Very new 2 Very Likely 0
  1. aOne of the six endoscopists in the pilot study did not complete the final tool evaluation