Development an extended-information success system model (ISSM) based on nurses’ point of view for hospital EHRs: a combined framework and questionnaire

Ebnehoseini, Zahra; Tabesh, Hamed; Deghatipour, Amir; Tara, Mahmood

doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01800-1

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Table 4 Effective factors on hospital EHR success in dimensions of proposed framework based on nurses’ characteristics

From: Development an extended-information success system model (ISSM) based on nurses’ point of view for hospital EHRs: a combined framework and questionnaire

Participants’ characteristics	Non-parametric tests	Technology				Organization			Human	Ease of use (EU)	Usefulness (UF)	Net benefits
Participants’ characteristics	Non-parametric tests	Computer resources (CR)	Information quality (IQ)	Service quality (SQ)	Training (T)	Task technology fit (TFF)	Social support (SS)	Top management support (TM)	Self-efficacy (SE)	Ease of use (EU)	Usefulness (UF)	Net benefits
Age	Kruskal–Wallis H	4.818	2.615	0.767	2.113	0.529	0.904	1.014	5.065	3.55	0.289	0.438
	Asymp. Sig	0.09	0.27	0.682	0.348	0.767	0.636	0.602	0.079	0.17	0.865	0.803
Gender	Mann–Whitney U	− 1.953	− 0.463	− 0.048	− 1.452	− 1.673	− 0.852	− 0.678	− 2.031	− 0.197	− 0.088	− 0.849
	Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)	0.051	0.643	0.961	0.147	0.094	0.394	0.498	0.042 ^a	0.844	0.93	0.396
Education level	Mann–Whitney U	− 0.279	− 0.441	− 0.332	− 0.75	− 0.745	− 0.216	− 1.025	− 0.083	− 3.378	− 0.071	− 0.755
	Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)	0.78	0.659	0.74	0.454	0.456	0.829	0.305	0.934	0.001 ^a	0.944	0.45
ICDL certification	Mann–Whitney U	− 1.051	− 1.113	− 0.544	− 0.374	− 0.254	− 0.426	− 0.089	− 0.345	− 1.55	− 0.331	− 0.343
	Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)	0.293	0.266	0.587	0.709	0.8	0.67	0.929	0.73	0.121	0.741	0.731
Nursing status	Mann–Whitney U	− 1.474	− 0.676	− 0.628	− 0.432	− 0.432	− 1.397	− 0.759	− 1.338	− 1.277	− 1.006	− 0.287
	Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)	0.141	0.499	0.53	0.666	0.666	0.162	0.448	0.181	0.202	0.315	0.774
Number of shifts per day	Mann–Whitney U	− 0.976	− 0.338	− 0.676	− 0.96	− 1.227	− 0.702	− 0.377	− 0.742	− 0.642	− 0.302	− 0.032
	Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)	0.329	0.735	0.499	0.337	0.22	0.483	0.706	0.458	0.521	0.763	0.975
Years of work experience (years)	Kruskal–Wallis H	1.378	5.018	1.566	4.442	1.972	0.854	0.526	1.221	2.524	1.003	1.644
	Asymp. Sig	0.502	0.081	0.457	0.108	0.373	0.652	0.769	0.543	0.283	0.606	0.44
Years of experience using computers (years)	Mann–Whitney U	− 0.057	− 0.582	− 1.678	− 2.499	− 0.533	− 0.238	− 1.012	− 0.274	− 0.928	− 1.301	− 0.239
	Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)	0.954	0.56	0.093	0.012 ^a	0.594	0.812	0.312	0.784	0.353	0.193	0.811
Years of experience using HIS (years)	Mann–Whitney U	− 0.539	− 0.848	− 0.808	− 1.075	− 0.287	− 0.287	− 2.122	− 0.431	− 0.203	− 0.519	− 0.096
	Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)	0.839	0.603	0.59	0.396	0.283	0.774	0.666	0.419	0.034 ^a	0.774	0.924

The significant results in each dimension are bloded and indicated by letters a (P < 0.05)

Back to article page

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com