Client categories (these groups were not mutually exclusive) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clients established on 1st or 2nd line ART (8 participants) | Mothers on PMTCT (12 Participants) | Young adults 18–24 years (10 participants) | Clients initiating 1st or 2nd line ART—(5 participants) | Most at Risk Populations (MARPS) (9 participants) | Positive partners in discordant relationship (11) | |
Main theme | ||||||
Willingness to pay | Most willing to pay (80%) | Most NOT willing to pay (80%) | Most willing to pay (80%) | Most NOT willing to pay (80%) | All willing to pay (100%) | All willing to pay (100%) |
Sub/emerging themes | ||||||
Payment modes | Mobile phone airtime deductions | Not reported | Mobile phone airtime deductions | Mobile phone airtime deductions | Using mobile money Mobile phone airtime deductions | Mobile phone airtime deductions |
Frequency of payment | Monthly deductions | Monthly deductions | Monthly, annually | Every 3 months | Weekly, monthly | Every day, monthly |
Amount to be paid (USD) | 13.5ȼ, 16.2ȼ and 2.7$ monthly and | 1.35$ monthly | 1.35$ monthly and 8.1 $–27.0$ annually | − 27.0ȼ to 13.5 $ | 13.5ȼ weekly, monthly | 1.35ȼ–18.9 ȼ daily and 4.1 ȼ–27.0ȼ monthly |
Why they should pay | C4LU been of benefit to them | Not reported, majority did not support the idea | Pay for useless things like lip-stick, so should pay for C4LU Been of benefit to health | Not reported, majority did not support the motion | Before C4LU, were initially badly off so deserve to pay If nutritional tips are added, they’d pay | Some already pay for health insurance and so can pay for C4LU |
Why they should not pay | Little earnings | Cannot afford Some even lack transport to appointments | None opposed | Cannot afford Some even lack transport to appointments Government already deducts a lot of tax from them | None objected | None objected |