Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison on the test dataset

From: Learning dynamic treatment strategies for coronary heart diseases by artificial intelligence: real-world data-driven study

Method

Estimated mortality

Jaccard

Trajectory-wise

State-wise

Clinician’s policy

0.0956

0.0959

–

Dual-LSTM

0.0887

0.0935

0.3171

AMANet

0.0827

0.0895

0.3250

DPO-LSTM

0.0919

0.0930

0.2069

SRL-Multimorbidity

0.0948

0.0953

0.2610

SL-LSTM (\(\varepsilon =0\))

0.0956

0.0967

0.3432

RL-LSTM (\(\varepsilon =1.0\))

0.0752

0.0721

0.0342

SRL-LSTM (\({\varvec{\varepsilon}}=0.4\))

0.0643

0.0878

0.3110

SRL-LSTM(\(\varepsilon =0.4\), w/o diagnosis codes)

0.0741

0.086

0.2233

  1. The bold indicates the prefered AI model to learn dynamic treatment strategies for CHD patients