Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the professional, state technical and judicial logics that are most relevant to the discussion in this paper [21]

From: Overcoming institutionalised barriers to digital health systems: an autoethnographic case study of the judicialization of a digital health tool

 

Professional logic

State technical logic

State judicial logic

Guiding values

Patient interest

Public interest

Constitutionalism

Actors with the legitimacy to debate issues that concern healthcare interventions

Regulators of professions

Healthcare professionals and their representatives

Regulators of professions

Healthcare professionals and their representatives

Legal practitioners,

Litigants (any rights-bearing individual)

Decision-making forums

Stakeholder meetings and other groupings of health professionals

Regulators’ internal committee meetings

Regulators’ internal committee meetings

Courts of law

Decision-makers with coercive power

Healthcare practice regulators

Healthcare practice regulators

Judges