Skip to main content

Table 1 Significant scholarly works that ML techniques to compare with the performance of APACHE II

From: Improvement of APACHE II score system for disease severity based on XGBoost algorithm

Study

Data source

Condition

Number of patients

Machine learning algorithms

Accuracy

AUC

Samaneh Layeghian Javan et al.[19]

MIMIC III

Cardiac arrest

4611

Stacking algorithm

0.76

0.82

Min Woo Kang et al.[20]

Seoul National University Hospital

Continuous renal replacement therapy

1571

Random forest

/

0.78

Meng Hsuen Hsieh et al. [21]

Chi-Mei Medical Center

Patients with unplanned extubation in intensive care units

341

Random forest

0.88

0.91

Zhongheng Zhang et al.[22]

SAILS study and OMEGA study

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

1071

Neural network

/

0.821

Dan Assaf et al.[21]

Sheba Medical Center

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)

162

Random forest

0.92

0.93

Grupo de Trabajo Gripe A Grave et al.[23]

GETGAG/SEMICYUC database

Severe influenza

3959

Random forest

0.83

0.82

Kuo-Ching Yuan et al.[24]

Taipei Medical University Hospital

Sepsis

434

XGBoost

0. 82

0.89

Scherpf M et al.[39]

MIMIC III

Sepsis

1050

Recurrent neural network

/

0.81

Zhang Z et al.[40]

MIMIC III

Acute kidney injury

6682

XGBoost

/

0.86

Kong G et al.[41]

MIMIC III

Sepsis

16,688

Gradient boosting machine

 

0.85

Our work

MIMIC III

ICU patients

24,777

XGBoost

0.87

0.81