The virtual human looked like a doctor
|
2 (2,4)
|
2.5 (1.3,4)
|
2 (2,2.5)
|
2.057
|
0.358
|
39
|
There was too much inconsistency in this application
|
4 (4,4)
|
4 (1.75, 4)
|
4 (4,5)
|
4.150
|
0.126
|
39
|
The application was easy to use
|
2 (1,2)
|
1.5 (1,2)
|
2 (1,2)
|
1.660
|
0.435
|
39
|
The virtual human looked very realistic
|
2 (2,4)
|
3 (2,4)
|
2 (2,3)
|
0.503
|
0.778
|
33
|
The virtual human had a pleasing voice
|
2 (2,2)
|
2 (2,2)
|
2 (1,2)
|
3.097
|
0.213
|
32
|
The virtual human's gestures distracted me as I tried to listen (reverse scored)
|
2 (1,2)
|
3.5 (2,4)
|
2 (1.5,2)
|
12.102
|
0.002*
|
40
|
The virtual human's gestures distracted me as I tried to listen
|
4 (4,5)
|
2.5 (2,4)
|
4 (4,4.5)
|
0.623
|
0.732
|
40
|
The virtual human looked trustworthy
|
2 (2,3)
|
2 (2,3)
|
2 (2,2)
|
2.665
|
0.264
|
41
|
The virtual human looked like an expert
|
3 (2,3)
|
3 (2,3)
|
2 (1.5,2)
|
6.078
|
0.048*
|
39
|