Table 5 Comparison of the advantages of the new method and manual verification
Advantages | Difference | Manual validation | New method | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Efficiency improvement | Whether to add extra workload? | YES | NO | No additional personnel are required to manually record the reason for the inconsistency. The new method is that the system completes judgment and records while personnel review the reports normally. The system will control the operation of the autoverification program based on the consistency results |
Can the cause of inconsistency be quickly determined? | NO | YES | The main reasons for the inconsistency are abnormal rule settings and lack of necessary rules. The new method correspondingly sets up correctness verification and integrity validation for these two main reasons. In different verification stages, only the main reason for that stage can be traced back | |
Risk control | Is it possible to skip the validation process? | YES | NO | Starting from setting the rules, the system will pull the validation process, and no validation link can be skipped |
Whether to ensure sufficient amount of validation data? | NO | YES | In the process of normal personnel issuance, the system will truthfully record the validation data. Before the set data volume is reached, the automated reporting function is prohibited | |
Can autoverification be used in the case of failed validation? | YES | NO | When the system confirms that the validation fails due to a defect in the autoverification, it will prohibit the rule conversion or the automated reporting from being enabled |