Skip to main content

Table 1 Two validation methods designed for two parts of the autoverification system

From: Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results

Phase Object Validation method Explanation Inconsistent solutions
Automatic warning Warning rules Correctness verification To verify that the warning rules behave as expected and produce the expected outcome If the warning rule setting is wrong, delete and reset the rules
Automated reporting Laboratory tests Integrity validation To confirm that the laboratory test results that pass the automatic warning can be reported automatically Add more warning rules according to the laboratory report criteria