Skip to main content

Table 1 Two validation methods designed for two parts of the autoverification system

From: Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results

Phase

Object

Validation method

Explanation

Inconsistent solutions

Automatic warning

Warning rules

Correctness verification

To verify that the warning rules behave as expected and produce the expected outcome

If the warning rule setting is wrong, delete and reset the rules

Automated reporting

Laboratory tests

Integrity validation

To confirm that the laboratory test results that pass the automatic warning can be reported automatically

Add more warning rules according to the laboratory report criteria