Table 1 Results from Type-III factorial ANOVA for explanation satisfaction scales (n = 80)
From: Examining the effect of explanation on satisfaction and trust in AI diagnostic systems
Time (week) | Explanation | Explanation: time | |
|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction | F (5,385) = 8.20 p < 0.001 ηp2 = 0.04 | F (2,77) = 0.54 p = 0.58 ηp2 = 0.01 | F (10,385) = 2.28 p = 0.01 ηp2 = 0.02 |
Sufficiency | F (5,385) = 7.52 p < 0.001 ηp2 = 0.03 | F (2,77) = 1.63 p = 0.20 ηp2 = 0.03 | F (10,385) = 3.14 p < 0.001 ηp2 = 0.03 |
Completeness | F (5,385) = 6.20 p < 0.001 ηp2 = 0.03 | F (2,77) = 2.95 p = 0.06 ηp2 = 0.04 | F (10,385) = 2.28 p = 0.01 ηp2 = 0.02 |
Usefulness | F (5,385) = 11.27 p < 0.001 ηp2 = 0.06 | F (2,77) = 0.95 p = 0.39 ηp2 = 0.01 | F (10,385) = 2.83 p = 0.002 ηp2 = 0.03 |
Accuracy | F (5,385) = 17.40 p < 0.001 ηp2 = 0.08 | F (2,77) = 4.16 p = 0.02 ηp2 = 0.06 | F (10,385) = 2.18 p = 0.02 ηp2 = 0.02 |
Trust | F (5,385) = 13.31 p < 0.001 ηp2 = 0.07 | F (2,77) = 3.03 p = 0.05 ηp2 = 0.04 | F (10,385) = 0.87 p = .0.50 ηp2 = 0.01 |