Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics for participating clinical sites (n = 9)

From: A principal components analysis of factors associated with successful implementation of an LVAD decision support tool

Variable type

Characteristic

Percentage

Organizational Variables

  

Patient Volume: Implants

  
 

11–30 implants

33%

 

31–50 implants

44%

 

 > 50 implants

22%

Patient Volume: Evaluations

  
 

36–50 evaluations

33%

 

51–100 evaluations

11%

 

 > 100 evaluations

56%

Patient Variables

  

Patient sickness level

  
 

Less sick

0%

 

About the same

22%

 

More sick

78%

Patient health literacy

  
 

Lower health literacy

22%

 

About the same health literacy

78%

 

Higher health literacy

0%

Patient language barriers

  
 

Rarely

44%

 

Sometimes

56%

 

Often

0%

Clinician/Staff Variables

  

Years of experience as VAD coordinator

  
 

0–4 years

56%

 

5–9 years

33%

 

 ≥ 10 years

11%

Average time spent on LVAD patient education

  
 

Little of my time

11%

 

Some of my time

67%

 

All of my time

22%

Use of decision aid compared to other clinical staff

  
 

Less than others

11%

 

Same amount as others

56%

 

More than others or only user

33%

Level of LVAD coordinator and physician interaction

  
 

Rarely

0%

 

Sometimes

11%

 

Frequently or always

89%

Satisfaction with decision aid

  
 

Somewhat or very dissatisfied

0%

 

Neutral

22%

 

Somewhat or very satisfied

78%

Satisfaction with standard education materials

  
 

Somewhat or very dissatisfied

22%

 

Neutral

22%

 

Somewhat or very satisfied

56%

Readiness for Change (ORIC)

  
 

Less ready

22%

 

Moderately ready

33%

 

Very ready

44%

Process

  

Standardization of decision aid (DA) use

  
 

Rarely

0%

 

Sometimes

11%

 

Frequently

89%

Integration of decision aid (DA) with standard education (SE) materials

  
 

Use SE more than the DA

22%

 

Use DA and SE about same

44%

 

Use DA exclusively or more than SE

33%

Outcome

  

Reach: 12 months*^

  
 

Sites with low reach (≤ x̅)

22%

 

Sites with medium reach

44%-82% (between 1 s.d

above/below )

44%

 

Sites with high reach ≥ 

33%

Reach: 18 months**^

  
 

Sites with low reach (≤ x̅)

22%

 

Sites with medium reach

46%-84% (between 1 s.d

above/below )

44%

 

Sites with high reach ≥ 

33%

  1. * x̅ = 63%; s.d. = 19%
  2. **x = 65%; s.d. = 19%
  3. ^ Does not include reach from one site who did not achieve start-up
  4. May not sum to 100% due to rounding
  5. Highest percentage values are bolded for each variable