Phase I: Development | |||
Ia Identifying existing evidence | |||
Literature review (n = 28 reviewed studies) | |||
Step | Aim | Results | Intervention |
A: for training | |||
B: for preparatory tool | |||
1 | To identify barriers and facilitators to SDM with older adults with MCC | Main barriers: | |
1. Personal patient characteristics such as being in poor health and/or having cognitive or physical impairments. | 1. Tailor information to capacity of patient, discuss decision capacity/needs (A) | ||
2. Feeling no permission to participate in SDM | 2. Explicit invitation to participate in SDM: The doctor has medical knowledge - you have knowledge of your personal situation - together, we can decide what is best for you! (AB) | ||
3. Health professionals with poor interpersonal skills, organizational barriers as time pressure and high turnover of patients. | 3. Good patient preparation before consultation enables moving more quickly to the important points of discussion (A) | ||
Main facilitators: | |||
1. The patient’s experiences of living with chronic health conditions | 1. Appraisal of personal experiences of patients (A) | ||
2. The assistance of informal caregivers in decision support. | 2. Involvement of informal caregiver in SDM by recognizing their contribution in care and inquiring about their concerns (AB) | ||
3. An individualized approach where health professionals seek patient’s preferences. | 3. Take personal goals into account by asking them what must happen to improve their quality of life (AB) | ||
Ib Gathering additional empirical evidence | |||
Qualitative content analysis of structured interviews (n = 547) | |||
To investigate the personal views on the ageing process communicated by older persons | 1. Acceptance of ageing, (further) deterioration and worries about limitations and family were important themes on the ageing process communicated by older persons. | 1.1 Facilitation of discussion about ‘what matters to you’ by asking them what must happen to improve their quality of life (AB) | |
1.2 Discuss personal goals that contribute to quality of life (A) | |||
Delphi study (n = 57) | |||
To explore what domains of health are important to discuss with a health professional, according to older adults in the Netherlands | 1. The domains older adults gained consensus on were: | 1.1 Address in goal talk these topics (AB) 1.2 Explore impact of MCC on daily life (A) | |
- functional limitations | |||
- emotional wellbeing | |||
- social functioning | |||
- quality of life | |||
- coping with stress | |||
- dealing with chronic health conditions and the effects of them on daily life | |||
DICO I Clinical video observational study Part 1 (n = 108) | |||
1. Which decisions face older adults with MCC and their informal caregivers during geriatric visits to the hospital? | 1. Main decisions are | 1) Share that there are often more options (A) | |
- Additional diagnostics | |||
- Medication | |||
- Follow-up | |||
- Referral to primary care (case manager, GP, physiotherapist, psychologist) | |||
2. What is the preferred and perceived role and participation in SDM for older adults with MCC and their informal caregivers? | 2. Main roles in decision making were for patients: ‘triadic decision making’ 41%<> 33% (preferred <> perceived), and for informal caregivers: ‘triadic decision making’ 71%<> 55% (preferred <> perceived). Preferred and perceived participation was for patients 6.6<> 5.1, for informal caregivers 7<> 5. | 2. Discuss how older adults with MCC and informal caregivers want to be involved in decision making. Involve them according to their preferences. (A) | |
3. To what extent are steps of the SDM process operationalized by geriatricians during geriatric consultations [15]? | 3 The OPTIONMCC score was 42.5 (0–100), items about ‘team talk’ and ‘evaluation’ scored the lowest (resp. 31 & 36.5). | 3. Train geriatricians in team talk and evaluation phase in the process of SDM. (A) |