Table 3 Outcome classification for trials
References | Primary outcome | Outcome summarization | Outcome impact | Outcome category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Beeler et al. [25] | Increasing the ratio of prescribing prophylaxis 6–24 h after admission/transfer | Increasing prescribing | + | Physician practice performance improved |
Eckman et al. [26] | Reducing disagreement among physicians | Reducing disagreement among physicians | + | |
Du et al. [27] | Increasing secondary preventive prescriptions after 15Â months in the intervention group | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Karlsson et al. [28] | Increasing the prescription of anticoagulation after 12Â months | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Mazzaglia et al. [29] | Increasing prescription of anti-blocking drugs | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Patel et al. [31] | Increasing the number of anti-inflammatory/lipid-lowering drugs | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Perestelo-pérez et al. [37] | Increasing satisfaction of decision making | Increasing satisfaction of decision making | + | |
Sáenz et al. [38] | Increasing long-term blood sugar using between group differences | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Geurts et al. [41] | Increase in standard use of oral rehydration solution | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Petersen et al. [43] | Increase in drug prescription in patients with risk above 5 percent | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Bourgeois et al. [44] | Reduced antibiotic prescriptions in visits by using templates | Reducing prescribing | + | |
Juszczyk et al. [45] | Reducing unnecessary prescription of antibiotics | Reducing prescribing | + | |
Mcdermott et al. [46] | Increasing physicians self-efficacy | Increasing physicians efficacy | + | |
Mcginn et al. [47] | Reduced antibiotic prescription | Reducing prescribing | + | |
Avansino et al. [51] | Increase in following clinical guidelines for systematic prescriptions compared to case prescriptions | Increase in following clinical guidelines | + | |
Awdishu et al. [52] | Increase in not taking medication or changing dose of inadequate drugs | Reducing prescribing | + | |
Erler et al. [53] | Reduction in the amount of medication received in the intervention group in excess of the prescribed dose | Reducing prescribing | + | |
Cox et al. [54] | Increase in the number of prescriptions for initial drug use | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Strom et al. [56] | Increasing the percentage of appropriate alerts that have been responded to by physicians in the intervention group compared to the control group | Increasing the percentage of appropriate alerts | + | |
Beeler et al. [60] | Increase in the average monitoring time of potassium level | Increase in the average monitoring time of potassium level | + | |
Eschmann et al. [62] | Decrease in the reaction time to reminders in physicians for monitoring alerts for potassium level | Decrease in the reaction time to reminders | + | |
Curtain et al. [5] | Reduction in the approved percentage of inhibitor intervention proton pump which is registered by the pharmacologist | Reduction in the approved percentage of inhibitor intervention proton pump which is registered by the pharmacologist | + | |
Turchin et al. [6] | Increasing overall efficiency of system functionalities prior to admission | Increasing overall efficiency of system functionalities | 0 | |
Griffey et al. [63] | Increasing the number of prescriptions by recommending the determined system dose | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Myers et al. [64] | Reducing the significant number of inappropriate abbreviations | Reducing prescribing | + | |
Van Stiphout et al. [65] | More efficient medical summary | More efficient medical summary | + | |
Akhu-zaheya et al. [32] | Increasing prescriptions in the short message group | Increasing prescribing | + | Patient outcome improved |
Khonsari et al. [33] | Increasing adherence to drug usage | Increasing adherence | + | |
Vervloet et al. [39] | Increasing adherence in the group receiving short messages | Increasing adherence | + | |
ervloet et al. [40] | Increasing the drug dosage in one hour during a six month period | Increasing prescribing | + | |
Elliott et al. [58] | Reducing the average number of days re-hospitalized 60Â days after discharge | Reducing the average number of days re-hospitalized | + | |
Bruxvoort et al. [59] | Knowledge of the physician in using Lumefantrine or thometer | Increased Knowledge of the physician | + | |
Tamblyn et al. [67] | Reduction in dose of drugs after one year for antipsychotics | Reducing prescribing | + | |
Luitjes et al. [35] | For the control group, reducing the secondary outcome of infant morbidity after implementation | Reducing morbidity | + | Physician practice performance and patient outcome improved |
Ackerman et al. [49] | Reducing excess prescription of antibiotics | Reducing prescribing | + | |
Pop-eleches et al. [50] | Reducing the number of treatment interruptions in both groups receiving weekly messages | Effective in process of care | + | |
Christensen et al. [34] | Reducing blood pressure after 12Â months | Reducing morbidity | 0 | Physician practice performance not improved |
Nielsen et al. [30] | Increasing the time outcome in the scope of treatment | Increasing the time outcome | 0 | |
Buhse et al. [36] | Reduction in faulty knowledge causing risk | Reducing risk | 0 | |
Gill et al. [42] | Increase in receiving care on the basis of instructions for patients with low-dose aspirin use (25%) | Increase in receiving care | 0 | |
Muth et al. [55] | Ineffectiveness of drug prescriptions after 6 and 9Â months | Ineffectiveness in process of care | 0 | |
Strom et al. [57] | Reduction in the appropriate response of physicians to alerts during 17Â months | Reduction in the appropriate response of physicians to alerts | 0 | |
Duke et al. [61] | Decrease in the conformity rate in normal risk patients for increased potassium | Decrease in the conformity rate in normal risk patients | 0 | |
Willis et al. [66] | Lack of difference in the rate of patient adherence to treatment, drug treatment significance, economic and clinical outcomes in three groups | No difference in process of care outcomes |  +  | Patient outcome not improved |
Mohammed et al. [48] | Inability to be effective in treatment success rate | Ineffectiveness in process of care | 0 |