Skip to main content

Table 3 Associated factors to the RHIS performance after univariable and multivariable analysis

From: Factors associated with the performance of routine health information system in Yaoundé-Cameroon: a cross-sectional survey

Variables

Good

Poor

Total

Univariable

Multivariable

OR (95%CI)

P

aOR (95%CI)

P

Status

     

Public

4 (26.7)

11 (73.3)

15 (100.0)

1

   

Private NPM

6 (37.5)

10 (62.5)

16 (100.0)

0.6 (0.1, 2.8)

0.52

  

Private PM

19 (25.0)

57 (75.0)

76 (100.0)

1.09 (0.3, 3.8)

0.89

  

HIU present

     

Yes

7(22.6)

24(77.4)

31(100)

0.7(0.3,1.9)

0.50

  

No

22(28.8)

54(71.2)

76(100)

1

   

Stable person in charge of statistics

     

Yes

23 (27.7)

60 (72.3)

83 (100)

1.4 (0.46,4.2)

0.56

  

No

5 (21.7)

18 (78.3)

23 (100)

1

   

Functional computer

     

Yes

19 (31.7)

41 (68.3)

60 (100)

1.76 (0.7, 4.2)

0.30

  

No

10 (21.3)

37 (78.7)

47 (100)

1

   

Stable Internet

     

Yes

15 (35.7)

27 (64.3)

42 (100)

2.2 (0.9, 5.2)

0.80

  

No

13 (20.3)

51 (79.7)

64 (100)

1

   

Call credit

     

Yes

20 (30.3)

46 (69.7)

66 (100)

1.5 (0.6, 3.9)

0.35

  

No

9 (22.0)

32 (78.0)

41 (100)

1

   

RHIS Supervision

     

Yes

23 (34.8)

43 (65.2)

66 (100)

3.03 (1.1, 8.3)

0.02

1.9 (0.6, 5.6)

0.2

No

6 (15.0)

34 (85.0)

40 (100)

1

 

1

 

Feedback received

     

Yes

26 (32.1)

55 (67.9)

81 (100)

3.6 (0.99, 13.2)

0.05

2.0 (0.5, 8.0)

0.3

No

3 (11.5)

23 (88.5)

26 (100)

1

 

1

 

Trained on HI

     

Yes

25 (36.8)

43 (63.2)

68 (100)

5.0 (1.6, 16.0)

0.003

3.3 (1.01,11.1)

0.04

No

4 (10.3)

35 (89.7)

39 (100)

1

 

1

 

PEP

       

Yes

14 (45.2)

17 (54.8)

31(100)

3.3 (1.4, 8.2)

0.007

2.3 (0.9, 6.0)

0.09

No

15 (19.7) 1 1

61 (80.3)

76(100)

1

 

1