Skip to main content

Table 2 Overall performance in \({\texttt {LOV}}\) on 26 testing patients

From: Cognitive biomarker prioritization in Alzheimer’s Disease using brain morphometric data

Method

Feature level

Task level

QH@5

WQH@5

NH\(_1\)@1

NH\(_1\)@5

NH\(_2\)@1

NH\(_2\)@5

NH\(_3\)@1

NH\(_3\)@5

NH\(_5\)@1

NH\(_5\)@5

NH\(_{\text {all}}\)@1

NH\(_{\text {all}}\)@5

\({\mathtt {PLTR}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{1.615}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{1.906}}\)

0.846

3.231

0.577

3.385

0.231

3.654

0.308

3.346

0.808

3.692

1.500

1.778

\(\underline{\textit{0.846}}\)

3.269

\(\underline{\textit{0.577}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{3.538}}\)

0.269

3.654

0.269

3.269

0.808

3.577

1.538

1.856

0.846

3.192

0.577

3.423

0.308

\(\underline{\textit{3.731}}\)

0.346

3.346

0.808

3.615

1.577

1.851

0.846

3.192

0.577

3.462

0.308

3.654

\(\underline{\textit{0.346}}\)

3.462

0.808

3.654

1.615

1.906

0.846

3.231

0.577

3.385

0.231

3.654

0.308

3.346

\(\underline{\textit{0.808}}\)

3.692

\({\mathtt {PLTR_h}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{1.615}}\)

1.836

\(\underline{\textit{0.846}}\)

3.192

\(\underline{\textit{0.577}}\)

3.500

0.269

3.731

\(\underline{\textit{0.346}}\)

3.731

\(\underline{\textit{0.808}}\)

4.154

1.538

1.891

0.846

3.192

0.577

3.500

0.269

3.731

0.346

3.615

0.808

4.038

1.538

1.856

0.769

3.308

0.577

3.462

0.269

3.615

0.308

3.385

0.808

3.500

1.538

1.712

0.846

3.115

0.577

3.423

0.154

\(\underline{\textit{3.731}}\)

0.308

3.808

0.808

\(\underline{\textit{4.269}}\)

\({\mathtt {KRL}}\)

1.423

1.656

0.615

2.615

\(\underline{\textit{0.577}}\)

3.308

0.038

3.577

\(\underline{\textit{0.346}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{3.962}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{0.808}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{4.269}}\)

1.346

1.881

0.577

2.615

0.577

3.308

0.038

3.577

0.346

3.962

0.808

4.269

1.346

1.435

0.808

\(\underline{\textit{3.423}}\)

0.538

3.500

\(\underline{\textit{0.346}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{3.731}}\)

0.154

3.423

0.808

3.538

\({\mathtt {BMTMKL}}\)

0.423

0.212

\(\underline{\textit{0.846}}\)

2.615

\(\underline{\textit{0.577}}\)

3.308

0.038

3.577

\(\underline{\textit{0.346}}\)

3.769

\(\underline{\textit{0.808}}\)

\(\underline{\textit{4.269}}\)

  1. The column “n” corresponds to the number of hold-out testing patients. The bset performance of each method is in italic.The best performance under each evaluation metric is underlined