Skip to main content

Table 2 The detection of lipid species as potential biomarkers for diagnosis of prostate cancer

From: Identification of plasma lipid species as promising diagnostic markers for prostate cancer

Group

Lipid species

P value

Fold-change

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

ROC Area

Cancer vs. BPH

LPE (20:0)

0.034

− 1.81

80.0%

44.7%

53.3%

73.9%

0.543

PA (38:3)

0.018

−2.34

73.3%

55.3%

56.4%

72.4%

0.643

PS (34:2)

0.009

−2.26

80.0%

57.9%

60%

78.6%

0.689

PC (44:5)

0.014

−2.21

83.3%

50.0%

56.8%

79.2%

0.624

PC (44:2)

0.004

−1.79

43.3%

89.5%

76.5%

66.7%

0.686

Combination of 5 lipids

–

–

73.3%

81.6%

75.9%

79.5%

0.800

Cancer vs. Control

PE (32:2)

0.009

2.29

43.3%

84.8%

65%

69.6%

0.653

PA (36:3)

0.007

−3.60

86.7%

47.8%

52%

84.6%

0.672

PS (34:2)

0.002

2.91

80%

60.9%

57.1%

82.4%

0.704

PE (40:3)

0.042

−1.43

23.3%

89.1%

58.3%

64.1%

0.628

PC (44:2)

0.017

−1.72

40%

87%

66.7%

69.0%

0.661

Combination of 5 lipids

–

–

76.7%

80.4%

71.9%

84.1%

0.836

Cancer vs. Non-cancer

PA (36:3)

0.011

−3.45

76.7%

44%

32.9%

84.1%

0.646

PS (34:2)

0.001

−2.62

76.7%

59.5%

40.4%

87.7%

0.633

PE (32:2)

0.010

2.04

30%

92.9%

60%

78.8%

0.614

LPE (20:0)

0.021

−1.79

70.0%

41.7%

30.0%

79.5%

0.578

PC (44:5)

0.021

−2.19

86.7%

39.3%

33.8%

89.2%

0.613

PC (44:2)

0.001

−1.75

3.3%

94%

16.7%

78.8%

0.661

 

Combination of 6 lipids

–

–

73.3%

82.1%

59.5%

89.6%

0.837

  1. BPH benign prostatic hyperplasia, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, ROC receiver operating characteristic curve