From: The detection of lung cancer using massive artificial neural network based on soft tissue technique
S. No | Feature Extortion | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | can.u | Co-ordinates of a nodule candidate(horizontal) |
2 | can.v | Co-ordinates of a nodule candidate(vertical) |
3 | can.Grad1 | Co-ordinates of a nodule likelihood values |
4 | can.CV1 | Computed by using gray level values |
5 | can.Grad2 | Co-ordinates of a nodule likelihood values |
6 | can.CV2 | Computed by using gray level values |
7 | Shape1 | Area for a segmented nodule candidate(Aregion) |
8 | Shape2 | Short and long axes of an ellipse which are robust to nodule candidate |
9 | Shape3 | Aregion/Aconvex hull |
10 | Shape4 | [dcandidate- center /squarero ot(Shape1/Л)] |
11 | Gray1 | μregion – μsurround The gray-level feature was estimated using fragmented candidates and their surrounding regions in both pre-processed image and nodule-enhanced image. A surrounding region was constructed by subtracting a candidate region from a dilated candidate region. μregion➔ Mean of a region μsurround➔Mean of a surrounding region |
12 | Gray2 | σregion- σsurround σregion➔Standard deviation of a region σsurround➔Standard deviation of a surrounding region |
13 | Gray3 | minregion-minsurround minregion➔ Minimum value of a region minsurround➔Minimum value of a surrounding region |
14 | Gray4 | maxregion-maxsurround maxregion ➔ Maximum value of a region maxsurround➔Maximum value of a surrounding region |
15 | Gray5 | Calculated using Gray1 |
16 | Gray6 | Calculated using Gray2 |
17 | Gray7 | Calculated using Gray3 |
18 | Gray8 | Calculated using Gray4 |
19 | Grad1 | \( \overline{\mathrm{Gr}}=\left(1/8\right)\sum \limits_{\mathrm{k}=0}^7{\mathrm{Gr}}^{\mathrm{h}} \) \( {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\mathrm{Gr}}^{\mathrm{h}}=\left[1/{\mathrm{N}}_{\mathrm{h}}\right]\sum \cos \kern0.28em {\alpha}_{\mathrm{mn}}\\ {}\mathrm{mn}\in {\mathrm{region}}_{\mathrm{h}}\\ {}{\mathrm{t}}_1\le {\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{mn}}\le {\mathrm{t}}_2\end{array}} \) where Nh is number of pixels in segmented candidate area h and cos αmn denotes likelihood values used in two stage nodule enhancement method |
20 | Grad2 | \( \upsigma =\surd \sum \limits_{\mathrm{k}=0}^7{\left({\mathrm{Gr}}^{\mathrm{h}}-\mathrm{Gr}\right)}^2 \) |
21 | Grad3 | \( =\overline{\mathrm{Gr}}/\sigma \) \( \overline{\mathrm{Gr}} \) denotes gradient feature |
22 | Surface1 | λmin Segmented candidate area in nodule enhanced image was robust to fourth order bivariate polynomial. The principal curvatures was computed at highest elevation point in the candidate region. |
23 | Surface2 | λmax |
24 | Surface3 | λmin λmax |
25 | Texture1 | ∑ [C(i,j)2] ij C(i,j) ➔Co-occurrence matrix computed over neighboring pixel and a summation range from minimum to maximum pixel value in pre-processed image |
26 | Texture2 | ∑ (i-j)2C(i,j)2 ij C(i,j) ➔Co-occurrence matrix calculated over neighboring pixels and a summation range from the minimum to the maximum pixel value in the pre-processed image. |
27 | Texture3 | Calculated based on Texture1 and Texture2 |
28 | Texture4 | Calculated based on Texture1 and Texture2 |
29 | Texture5 | Calculated based on Texture1 and Texture2 |
30 | Texture6 | Calculated based on Texture1 and Texture2 |
31 | False Positive | Loverlap / Lregion Where Lregion is length of boundary of a candidate area and Loverlap is number of pixels on boundary that overlap edge chain. |