Skip to main content

Table 4 Feature Extortion

From: The detection of lung cancer using massive artificial neural network based on soft tissue technique

S. No

Feature Extortion

Description

1

can.u

Co-ordinates of a nodule candidate(horizontal)

2

can.v

Co-ordinates of a nodule candidate(vertical)

3

can.Grad1

Co-ordinates of a nodule likelihood values

4

can.CV1

Computed by using gray level values

5

can.Grad2

Co-ordinates of a nodule likelihood values

6

can.CV2

Computed by using gray level values

7

Shape1

Area for a segmented nodule candidate(Aregion)

8

Shape2

Short and long axes of an ellipse which are robust to nodule candidate

9

Shape3

Aregion/Aconvex hull

10

Shape4

[dcandidate- center /squarero ot(Shape1/Л)]

11

Gray1

μregion – μsurround

The gray-level feature was estimated using fragmented candidates and their surrounding regions in both pre-processed image and nodule-enhanced image. A surrounding region was constructed by subtracting a candidate region from a dilated candidate region. μregion➔ Mean of a region

μsurround➔Mean

of a surrounding region

12

Gray2

σregion- σsurround

σregion➔Standard deviation of a region

σsurround➔Standard deviation of a surrounding region

13

Gray3

minregion-minsurround

minregionâž” Minimum value of a region

minsurround➔Minimum value of a surrounding region

14

Gray4

maxregion-maxsurround

maxregion âž” Maximum value of a region

maxsurround➔Maximum value of a surrounding region

15

Gray5

Calculated using Gray1

16

Gray6

Calculated using Gray2

17

Gray7

Calculated using Gray3

18

Gray8

Calculated using Gray4

19

Grad1

\( \overline{\mathrm{Gr}}=\left(1/8\right)\sum \limits_{\mathrm{k}=0}^7{\mathrm{Gr}}^{\mathrm{h}} \)

\( {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\mathrm{Gr}}^{\mathrm{h}}=\left[1/{\mathrm{N}}_{\mathrm{h}}\right]\sum \cos \kern0.28em {\alpha}_{\mathrm{mn}}\\ {}\mathrm{mn}\in {\mathrm{region}}_{\mathrm{h}}\\ {}{\mathrm{t}}_1\le {\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{mn}}\le {\mathrm{t}}_2\end{array}} \)

where Nh is number of pixels in segmented candidate area h and cos αmn denotes likelihood values used in two stage nodule enhancement method

20

Grad2

\( \upsigma =\surd \sum \limits_{\mathrm{k}=0}^7{\left({\mathrm{Gr}}^{\mathrm{h}}-\mathrm{Gr}\right)}^2 \)

21

Grad3

\( =\overline{\mathrm{Gr}}/\sigma \)

\( \overline{\mathrm{Gr}} \) denotes gradient feature

22

Surface1

λmin

Segmented candidate area in nodule enhanced image was robust to fourth order bivariate polynomial. The principal curvatures was computed at highest elevation point in the candidate region.

23

Surface2

λmax

24

Surface3

λmin λmax

25

Texture1

∑ [C(i,j)2]

ij

C(i,j) ➔Co-occurrence matrix computed over neighboring pixel and a summation range from minimum to maximum pixel value in pre-processed image

26

Texture2

∑ (i-j)2C(i,j)2

ij

C(i,j) ➔Co-occurrence matrix calculated over neighboring pixels and a summation range from the minimum to the maximum pixel value in the pre-processed image.

27

Texture3

Calculated based on Texture1 and Texture2

28

Texture4

Calculated based on Texture1 and Texture2

29

Texture5

Calculated based on Texture1 and Texture2

30

Texture6

Calculated based on Texture1 and Texture2

31

False Positive

Loverlap / Lregion Where Lregion is length of boundary of a candidate area and Loverlap is number of pixels on boundary that overlap edge chain.