Skip to main content

Table 2 Diabetes App (Non-)Use and Social Support – Study 1

From: Differential influences of social support on app use for diabetes self-management – a mixed methods approach

 

Non-User of Diabetes Apps

Diabetes App User

App user type

The diabetes app non-user without interest in diabetes apps

The interested non-user of diabetes apps

The dissatisfied adopter of diabetes apps

The experienced diabetes app switcher

The consistent long-term diabetes app user

Self-management

No risk group, experienced with good perceived diabetes knowledge, mainly good self-management

Diabetes risk group, lacking diabetes knowledge or misperceptions, avoidance strategies, insufficient self-management, dangerous health behaviors

No risk group, good diabetes knowledge (educated at young age), good self-management

No risk group, very good diabetes knowledge, very good self-management, experienced, strict regimen

No risk group, specialized diabetes knowledge, intense diabetes education, good self-management, strict carb counting, active

Medical specialty of healthcare professionals (HCPs)

Mainly general practitioners

Mainly general practitioners

Diabetes specialists

General practitioners or diabetes specialists

Diabetes specialists, partly other HCPs as part of a diabetes program

Perceived physician quality

Partly incontent, or content after choosing selected physicians

Incontent, physicians not supportive (with exceptions)

Content but also seeing downsides

Content or incontent, depending on medical specialty of physician

Content, physicians as “friends”

Decision-making

Independent patient decision-making

Dependent or independent patient decision-making with dangerous health behaviors

Independent patient decision-making but listening to HCP advice, shared decision-making

Independent patient decision-making

Shared decision-making with close relationships between HCP and patient

Physician communi-cation

Partly short consultations, no engagement, patients need to ask questions to receive information

Short consultations, physicians not helpful, answer questions only (no further engagement)

Consultations also through Email/online/ calls, close relationships with intense communication, partly busy doctors

Short consultations (general practitioners), longer consultations but more expensive (specialists), partly contact through Email

Discussions similar to friends’ relationships, honesty in consultations, partly long consultations

Support group participation

Support group leader or follower

No support group participation or support group follower only

Support group follower or leader, volunteering for other patients, part of diabetes program

Support group leader or follower

Support group leader, part of a diabetes or app pilot program

Family/friend support

Managing without support or negative influences by family/friends (but perceived relevance of support)

Managing without support, rarely support by family

Involvement/ support by family only right after diagnose (beginning of the disease)

Support especially by friends, family support

Partly family support, sometimes negative family/friend influences

Interviewees (IP no., age group, diabetes type)

IP2, 56–60, T2DM

IP7, 66–70, T2DM

IP8, 61–65, T1DM

IP9, 66–70, pre-diab

(IP17, 61–65, T2DM)

IP4, 46–50, T2DM

IP10, 56–60, T2DM

(IP12, 61–65, T2DM)

IP15, 46–50, T2DM

IP20, unknown, T2DM

IP1, 16–20, T1DM

IP11, 21–25, T1DM

IP16, 21–25, T1DM

IP18, 16–20, T1DM

IP3, 66–70, T2DM

IP13, 56–60, T1DM

IP21, 56–60, T1DM

IP5, 26–30, T2DM

IP6, 56–60, T2DM

IP14, 41–45, T1DM

IP19, 31–35, T1DM

  1. Note. Table based on Brew-Sam [4]