Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison with baseline PRF retrieval models in certain metrics

From: An adaptive term proximity based rocchio’s model for clinical decision support retrieval

 

BM25+Rocchio

RM3

HRoc1

HRoc2

HRoc3

MAP

0.0490

0.0540

0.0651 + (32.8%,20.5%)

0.0647 + (32.0%,19.8%)

0.0642 + (31.0%,18.9%)

P@5

0.2733

0.2600

0.2933 + (7.32%,12.8%)

0.2733 + (0.00%,5.11%)

0.2733 + (0.00%,5.11%)

P@10

0.2533

0.2467

0.2733 + (7.89%,10.8%)

0.2667 + (5.29%,8.11%)

0.2567 + (1.34%,4.25%)

P@20

0.2167

0.2233

0.2350 + (8.44%,5.24%)

0.2317 + (6.92%, 3.76%)

0.2317 + (6.92%, 3.76%)

F1

0.0853

0.0932

0.1112 + (30.3%,19.3%)

0.1108 + (29.9%,18.9%)

0.1096 + (28.5%, 17.6%)

  1. The values in parentheses represent the improvements over BM25+Rocchio and RM3 respectively. The best result obtained is shown in bold, and the superscripts “*” and “+” denote statistically significant improvements over BM25+Rocchio and RM3, respectively (Wilcoxon signed-rank test with p<0.05)