Skip to main content

Table 3 Measurement Model; Results of AVE (Convergent Validity), CR, CA (Reliability Testing) and KMO (Sampling Adequacy Test)

From: “Assessment of the social influence and facilitating conditions that support nurses’ adoption of hospital electronic information management systems (HEIMS) in Ghana using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model”

Constructs

Mean

S. Dev.

Variance

AVE

CR

CA

KMO

PE

5.248

1.046

1.095

0.695

0.896

0.779

0.754

EE

5.600

0.934

0.873

0.801

0.941

0.915

0.802

ATUT

5.460

1.062

1.128

0.700

0.901

0.831

0.785

SI

5.386

1.078

1.163

0.633

0.859

0.709

0.745

SE

5.378

1.026

1.053

0.657

0.884

0.824

0.760

FC

4.105

1.183

1.399

0.546

0.824

0.723

0.564

ANX

4.140

1.256

1.577

0.594

0.845

0.753

0.708

BI

5.583

1.195

1.429

0.944

0.985

0.980

0.873

UB

6.094

1.978

3.912

0.901

0.948

0.842

0.560

  1. NB: AVE – Average Variance Extracted, CR – Composite Reliability, CA – Cronbach’s Alpha, KMO - Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and S. Dev – Standard Deviation. SI – Social Influence, FC – Facilitating Conditions, BI – Behavioral Intention and UB – Use Behavior
Back to article page

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us