Skip to main content

Table 3 Frequencies and percentages of data entry and data privacy

From: How should electronic health records be designed? A cross-sectional study in patients with psoriasis

 

Total [n]

(missing [n])

+

[n(%)]

O

[n(%)]

-

[n(%)]

Can you think of entering data into an EHR

184 (3)

156 (84.8)

10 (5.4)

18 (9.8)

Can you think of entering data at home*

166 (21)

135 (72.2)

6 (3.2)

25 (13.4)

Can you think of entering data in the waiting room*

158 (29)

84 (44.9)

10 (5.3)

64 (34.2)

Can you think of entering data using own smartphone/tablet*

164 (23)

115 (61.5)

8 (4.3)

41 (21.9)

Can you think of entering data using own laptop/computer*

158 (29)

117 (62.6)

8 (4.3)

33 (17.6)

Can you think of entering data using provided device*

158 (29)

86 (46.0)

10 (5.3)

62 (33.2)

Me as a patient should be able to decide who has access to my data

184 (3)

178 (96.7)

6 (3.3)

0 (0.0)

Me as a patient should know where and how my data is stored

181 (6)

181 (100)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Only eligible persons should be able to enter information about me

183 (4)

176 (96.2)

4 (2.2)

3 (1.6)

I would agree on providing my data for scientific/research purposes

183 (4)

171 (93.4)

6 (3.3)

6 (3.3)

Information needs to be stored and displayed with sufficient clarity, so it can be considered during treatment

182 (5)

177 (97.3)

0 (0.0)

5 (2.7)

Physician needs to actually consider data for decision-making

179 (8)

171 (95.5)

4 (2.2)

4 (2.2)

  1. Cases with missing values are excluded from analysis. *variable with > 5% missing values: total percentages (basic values include missing values) are displayed; +: (totally) agree/applies; O: neither nor; −: (totally) disagree/not applies