| System usefulness (items 1–8) | Information quality (items 9–15) | Interface quality (items 16–18) | Overall satisfaction (item 19) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Participant 1: | 6.0 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 5.0 |
Participant 2: | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Participant 3: | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Participant 4: | 6.1 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Participant 5: | 7.0 | 7.0 | 3.3 | 5.0 |
Participant 6: | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Participant 7: | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Gastroenterologists: (n = 2) median (range) | 7.0 (6.0–7.0) | 7.0 (4.8–7.0) | 6.0 (4.7–7.0) | 6.0 (5.0–7.0) |
Oncologists: (n = 5) median (range) | 6.5 (6.0–7.0) | 6.5 (60–7.0) | 6.5 (6.0–7.0) | 6.5 (6.0–7.0) |