Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Pseudonymization for research data collection: is the juice worth the squeeze?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Mar 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Griffin Weber
30 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harold Solbrig
31 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Florian Kohlmayer
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Griffin Weber
5 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Florian Kohlmayer
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Florian Kohlmayer
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12911-019-0905-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement