Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Sep 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou|
|31 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gordon Schiff|
|4 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Sibbald|
|16 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ashley N.D. Meyer|
|28 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laura Zwaan|
|10 Mar 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Julie Abimanyi-Ochom|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Mar 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ashley N.D. Meyer|
|14 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laura Zwaan|
|15 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou|
|6 Aug 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Julie Abimanyi-Ochom|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Aug 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Aug 2019||Editorially accepted|
|30 Aug 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12911-019-0901-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.