Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “You have to know why you're doing this”: a mixed methods study of the benefits and burdens of self-tracking in Parkinson's disease

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Feb 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Therese Scott Duncan
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ju Wang
23 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts
3 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Therese Scott Duncan
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts
28 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ju Wang
7 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Sara Riggare
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Sara Riggare
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
14 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
30 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12911-019-0896-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement