Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Using an analogical reasoning framework to infer language patterns for negative life events

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Sep 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gilles Richard
26 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
1 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jheng-Long Wu
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gilles Richard
8 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
24 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jheng-Long Wu
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gilles Richard
23 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
12 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jheng-Long Wu
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
28 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12911-019-0895-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement