Development and validation of a patient decision aid for prostate Cancer therapy: from paternalistic towards participative shared decision making
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Mar 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Scalia|
|3 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Axel Semjonow|
|17 Jun 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Anshu Ankolekar|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jun 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Axel Semjonow|
|25 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Scalia|
|1 Jul 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Anshu Ankolekar|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Jul 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12911-019-0862-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.