Table 3 p notation represent individual participants ratings
From: Architecture and usability of OntoKeeper, an ontology evaluation tool
SUS Items | p 1 | p 2 | p 3 | p 4 | p 5 | μ(σ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I think that I would like to use this system frequently | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4.8 (0.45) |
I found the system unnecessarily complex | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (0) |
I thought the system was easy to use. | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4.6 (0.89) |
I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system. | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 (1.73) |
I found the various functions in this system were well integrated. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 (0) |
I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (0) |
I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4.8 (0.45) |
I found the system very cumbersome to use. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (0) |
I felt very confident using the system. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 (0) |
I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system. | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1.8 (1.30) |
SUS Calculated Score | 92.5 | 90 | 87.5 | 97.5 | 100 | Â |