Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Automatically determining cause of death from verbal autopsy narratives

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Byass
31 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Owen Johnson
5 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Reeves
19 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Byass
19 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Owen Johnson
10 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Serena Jeblee
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Reeves
1 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Owen Johnson
9 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Byass
3 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Byass
19 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Serena Jeblee
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Owen Johnson
10 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Byass
12 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Serena Jeblee
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 Jun 2019 Editorially accepted
9 Jul 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12911-019-0841-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement